Tap WaterIndex

← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Muncy State Correctional Inst

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
16
detected
2,050
people served
4
health-based violations
Pennsylvania rankingsLead in PennsylvaniaPFAS in Pennsylvania
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Lycoming

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
213
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1991-05-01 → 1991-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1991-05-01 → 1991-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1991-05-01 → 1991-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1991-05-01 → 1991-05-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MR Monitoring Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
463.6 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 829 µg/L
29/29 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
2400 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
20.895 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
1.43 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
8/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.6750 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
6/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
5/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
27.8 µg/L 185%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L
5/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.8900 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9200 µg/L
4/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
12.8915 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L
4/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.48 µg/L
3/11 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
2.408 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L
3/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
1.27 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
3/25 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 2/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0230 mg/L 153%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
 2/2 LCR 1996
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/11 SYR4 2012–2019
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MARK STROBLE,
Phone
570-546-3171

Frequently asked questions about Muncy State Correctional Inst

Is Muncy State Correctional Inst tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Muncy State Correctional Inst's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Muncy State Correctional Inst's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Barium, Tetrachloroethylene, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Muncy State Correctional Inst serve?

Muncy State Correctional Inst reports serving 2,050 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Muncy State Correctional Inst had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 213 violations on file for Muncy State Correctional Inst, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.