Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 150.2 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 179 µg/L | 79/80 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 79.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 106 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 90.08 µg/L 113% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 105 µg/L 175% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L | 57/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.7475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.65 µg/L | 34/57 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 40.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 77.935 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lead | 3.677 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 27/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 45.3 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 615.3 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 630 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 1 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 2.6 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.82 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.14 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth
Is Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth serve?
Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth reports serving 8,500 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 782 violations on file for Ebensburg Boro Muni Auth, of which 152 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.