Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-10-01 → 1999-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 253.2 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 306 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 3638 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3680 µg/L | 28/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 23.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.4 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 27.315 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.9 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 12/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 20.25 µg/L 135% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 12/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.379 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.55 µg/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 86 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 4/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 1995 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Fluoride | 600 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.0015 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rawa North Heidelberg
Is Rawa North Heidelberg tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Rawa North Heidelberg's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rawa North Heidelberg's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rawa North Heidelberg serve?
Rawa North Heidelberg reports serving 1,350 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Rawa North Heidelberg had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 527 violations on file for Rawa North Heidelberg, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.