Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-08-01 → 2019-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 4540.5 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4910 µg/L | 200/202 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 152/152 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 89.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 103.6 µg/L | 152/152 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.9 µg/L | 152/152 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 103.47 µg/L 129% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 120.6 µg/L | 152/152 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 67.485 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L | 138/152 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1410 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2077 µg/L | 91/93 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.2 µg/L | 63/152 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 16 µg/L 160% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 59/99 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 21.25 µg/L 142% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L | 26/93 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0020 mg/L 13% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 300 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 20/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.825 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.5 µg/L | 16/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 42.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/26 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L | 12/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.835 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 12/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 9/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 2.09 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 8/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 7.21905 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.2248 µg/L | 7/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 0.7800 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L | 5/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 128 µg/L 3.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 5/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethylene | 1.81 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 3/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 2 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 2/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.5000 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
77 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Paw Glen Alsace Div
Is Paw Glen Alsace Div tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 32 contaminants in Paw Glen Alsace Div's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Paw Glen Alsace Div's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Paw Glen Alsace Div serve?
Paw Glen Alsace Div reports serving 24,951 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Paw Glen Alsace Div had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 122 violations on file for Paw Glen Alsace Div, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.