Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-07-08 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-08-01 → 2018-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-09-01 → 2016-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1203 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1220 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 232.5 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3690 µg/L | 32/35 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 292.9 µg/L 1953% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 386 µg/L | 8/35 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 293.8 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 319 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 3.98 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.2010 mg/L 1340% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2016 |
| Combined Uranium | 5.6471 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.96 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 266 µg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| TTHM | 4.555 µg/L 5.7% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Chloroform | 0.6000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Nitrite | 1 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
66 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Himalayan Institute
Is Himalayan Institute tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Himalayan Institute's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Himalayan Institute's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Barium, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Himalayan Institute serve?
Himalayan Institute reports serving 124 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Himalayan Institute had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 676 violations on file for Himalayan Institute, of which 31 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.