Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-09-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-05-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 2213.5 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2290 µg/L | 30/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1358.5 µg/L 105% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1530 µg/L | 8/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 437 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 443 µg/L | 5/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0490 mg/L 327% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 4/4 | LCR | 1998 |
| Lead | 14.4 µg/L 96% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 4/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 9.81761 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.6237 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| TTHM | 5.08 µg/L 6.4% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.935 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Bromoform | 0.9900 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Chloroform | 1.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2018 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Happy Acres Development
Is Happy Acres Development tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Happy Acres Development's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Happy Acres Development's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Barium, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Happy Acres Development serve?
Happy Acres Development reports serving 168 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Happy Acres Development had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 1620 violations on file for Happy Acres Development, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 26 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.