Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-07-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 936.5 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 68/68 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 5116 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5660 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 7.47 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 32/93 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.7 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 37.825 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.2 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 60.275 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75.2 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.075 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.3 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 7.605 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 12/64 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 10/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 470 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 480 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 5.27502 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.49065 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2019 |
| Toluene | 1.6 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
86 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Buckingham Twp Cold Spring
Is Buckingham Twp Cold Spring tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Buckingham Twp Cold Spring's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Buckingham Twp Cold Spring's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Arsenic, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Buckingham Twp Cold Spring serve?
Buckingham Twp Cold Spring reports serving 4,760 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Buckingham Twp Cold Spring had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 54 violations on file for Buckingham Twp Cold Spring, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.