← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Dtma Main

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 33. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
33
detected
8,655
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bucks

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
203
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0098 µg/L 14/18 2025
Pfhxa 0.0084 µg/L 14/18 2025
PFOA 0.0142 µg/L 14/18 2025
PFOS 0.0134 µg/L 14/18 2025
Pfpea 0.0104 µg/L 14/18 2025
Pfhpa 0.0072 µg/L 11/18 2025
PFNA 0.0074 µg/L 4/18 2025
Pfba 0.0063 µg/L 3/18 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1300 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2500 µg/L
271/271 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
5149 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5830 µg/L
222/222 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
520 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L
32/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
23 µg/L 153%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 77 µg/L
30/271 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
19.55 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.6 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L
26/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
7.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L
21/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Tetrachloroethylene
3.025 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
20/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.25 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
16/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
12/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
5.55 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L
11/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
7.025 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
10/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
4.155 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
10/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
6.16473 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.20883 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
6.9 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
6/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Lithium
15.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/18 UCMR-5 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.585 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2018–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2018–2019
Fluoride
224 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
4/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Ethylbenzene
1.09 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
3/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2018–2019
1,1-Dichloroethylene
2.1 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
1/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Styrene
0.7800 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/54 SYR4 2012–2019
46 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneHfpo-DaMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BRENT EATON
Phone
215-348-9915

Frequently asked questions about Dtma Main

Is Dtma Main tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 33 contaminants in Dtma Main's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dtma Main's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Barium, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dtma Main serve?

Dtma Main reports serving 8,655 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Dtma Main had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 203 violations on file for Dtma Main, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.