← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Upper Southampton Mun Auth

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
28
detected
16,000
people served
30
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bucks

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

30
health-based violations
858
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-09-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-09-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-09-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-09-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-11-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-11-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-11-12
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-11-12
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0193 µg/L 4/8 2024
PFBS 0.0075 µg/L 4/8 2024
Pfhpa 0.0051 µg/L 4/8 2024
Pfhxa 0.0076 µg/L 4/8 2024
PFHXS 0.0050 µg/L 4/8 2024
PFOA 0.0142 µg/L 4/8 2024
PFOS 0.0164 µg/L 4/8 2024
Pfpea 0.0083 µg/L 4/8 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
42.315 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
11.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.8 µg/L
123/123 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
57.47 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 98.3 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
28.58 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 70.1 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.78 µg/L
110/123 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
332.05 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L
94/94 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8 µg/L 53%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 26 µg/L
41/93 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
2707.5 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2730 µg/L
36/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2018–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2018–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/32 SYR4 2018–2019
Bromoform
0.7430 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
7/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
4.68352 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.13454 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
663.3 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 704 µg/L
3/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
6.28 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
2.145 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
0.5200 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroethylene
0.6000 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.1700 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2013–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BARBARA O'NEILL
Phone
215-364-1390

Frequently asked questions about Upper Southampton Mun Auth

Is Upper Southampton Mun Auth tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Upper Southampton Mun Auth's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Upper Southampton Mun Auth's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Upper Southampton Mun Auth serve?

Upper Southampton Mun Auth reports serving 16,000 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Upper Southampton Mun Auth had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 858 violations on file for Upper Southampton Mun Auth, of which 30 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.