Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-01-01 → 1995-06-21 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-01-01 → 1995-06-21 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0140 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 268 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 418 µg/L | 71/74 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 92.3 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 133 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 71.54 µg/L 119% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.2 µg/L | 65/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.1 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 67.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85.1 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 34.53 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.8 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 25.445 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.4 µg/L | 52/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.1225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 50/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.866 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.56 µg/L | 29/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.75 µg/L | 11/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.535 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.55 µg/L | 6/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 50.74 µg/L 338% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.3 µg/L | 5/74 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.688 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.74 µg/L | 3/52 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rogers Co Rwd # 8
Is Rogers Co Rwd # 8 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Rogers Co Rwd # 8's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rogers Co Rwd # 8's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rogers Co Rwd # 8 serve?
Rogers Co Rwd # 8 reports serving 3,375 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Rogers Co Rwd # 8 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Rogers Co Rwd # 8, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.