Is Kusa Rwd #3 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Okmulgee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-10-17
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-10-17
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30
RPT	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-10-17
RPT	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-10-17
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-12-01 → 2023-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-12-01 → 2023-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-12-01 → 2023-02-28
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-12-01 → 2023-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	17.505 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	89.155 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 90.6 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	32.43 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 34.3 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	109.805 µg/L 137% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 113.8 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	55.79 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 73.3 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	28.375 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 35.6 µg/L	18/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	3.74 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L	17/18	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0017 mg/L 11% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	9/9	LCR	2025
Copper	28.03 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 30.7 µg/L	7/35	SYR4	2013–2016
Monochloroacetic Acid	5.574 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.42 µg/L	7/18	SYR4	2013–2019

4 contaminants tested, none detected

BromoformDibromoacetic AcidLeadMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: KUSA RWD #3
Phone: 918-652-4972
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kusa Rwd #3

Is Kusa Rwd #3 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Kusa Rwd #3's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kusa Rwd #3's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kusa Rwd #3 serve?

Kusa Rwd #3 reports serving 240 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Kusa Rwd #3 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 62 violations on file for Kusa Rwd #3, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.