Is Noble County Rwd #2 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Noble

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	201.7 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 274 µg/L	59/120	SYR4	2014–2019
TTHM	99.34 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 125 µg/L	25/25	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	26.53 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 33.1 µg/L	19/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	26.78 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 32.9 µg/L	19/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	25.905 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 38.4 µg/L	18/25	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	27.145 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 28.9 µg/L	14/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	13/13	LCR	2025
Dichloroacetic Acid	21.11 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 24.3 µg/L	12/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	6.536 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L	12/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	19.58 µg/L 131% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L worst single sample: 21.2 µg/L	10/120	SYR4	2014–2019
Bromoform	6.615 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.79 µg/L	8/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	4.1285 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.23 µg/L	8/19	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	5.92 µg/L No EPA limit set	1/19	SYR4	2013–2019

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: NOBLE COUNTY RWD #2
Phone: 580-336-0246
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Noble County Rwd #2

Is Noble County Rwd #2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Noble County Rwd #2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Noble County Rwd #2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Noble County Rwd #2 serve?

Noble County Rwd #2 reports serving 2,100 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Noble County Rwd #2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 42 violations on file for Noble County Rwd #2, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.