Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 106.72 µg/L 133% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 151 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 114.29 µg/L 190% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 157 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 414.6 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 563 µg/L | 59/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.8 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 83.855 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 134 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 54.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.8 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 61.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78.9 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 47/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 7.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L | 23/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.48 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 13/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.027 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 3/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 35.2 µg/L 235% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L | 1/59 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck)
Is Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck) serve?
Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck) reports serving 1,000 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 190 violations on file for Muskogee Co. Rwd #2 (Gooseneck), of which 168 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.