Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 193.5 µg/L 242% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 266 µg/L | 72/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.15 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 71/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 52.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61.9 µg/L | 70/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 75.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 89.7 µg/L | 48/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 178.8 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 264 µg/L | 42/52 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 53.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 125 µg/L | 30/73 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 16.625 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.4 µg/L | 16/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.527 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 15/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.0555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.37 µg/L | 12/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2026 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.01 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.29 µg/L | 6/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.25 µg/L | 3/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Kay County Rural Water District 7
Is Kay County Rural Water District 7 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Kay County Rural Water District 7's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Kay County Rural Water District 7's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Kay County Rural Water District 7 serve?
Kay County Rural Water District 7 reports serving 920 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Kay County Rural Water District 7 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 85 violations on file for Kay County Rural Water District 7, of which 75 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.