Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0059 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 730 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1330 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 219.4 µg/L 274% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 279.5 µg/L | 56/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 52.145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 35.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 43.4 µg/L | 49/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 80.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 118 µg/L | 49/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 53.36 µg/L 89% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 71.2 µg/L | 49/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 88.105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 102 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 11.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.4 µg/L | 44/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 57.3 µg/L | 41/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L | 36/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2024 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 15/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.64 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 5/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 11.89 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.2 µg/L | 2/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Altus Afb
Is Altus Afb tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Altus Afb's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Altus Afb's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Altus Afb serve?
Altus Afb reports serving 4,617 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Altus Afb had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 165 violations on file for Altus Afb, of which 133 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.