Is Garfield Co Rwd #7 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: GWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Garfield

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-10-02
Other	Monitoring	Resolved	2023-10-02
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	1196 µg/L 92% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 1920 µg/L	55/55	SYR4	2015–2019
Lead	0.0011 mg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	16/16	LCR	2023
Lead	11 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 12 µg/L	5/55	SYR4	2015–2019
Bromodichloromethane	10.4265 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Bromoform	4.7435 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.76 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Chloroform	6.7545 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.26 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid	3.4205 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 3.44 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Dibromochloromethane	10.27 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
TTHM	31.08 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	6.2815 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 6.37 µg/L	4/4	SYR4	2013–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid	2.907 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.93 µg/L	2/4	SYR4	2013–2018

3 contaminants tested, none detected

Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact: GARFIELD CO RWD #7
Phone: 580-242-6328
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Garfield Co Rwd #7

Is Garfield Co Rwd #7 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Garfield Co Rwd #7's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Garfield Co Rwd #7's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Garfield Co Rwd #7 serve?

Garfield Co Rwd #7 reports serving 288 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Garfield Co Rwd #7 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 44 violations on file for Garfield Co Rwd #7, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.