Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 414.6 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 606 µg/L | 112/121 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 75.555 µg/L 94% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 87.5 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 27.525 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.3 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 26.11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.6 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 35.335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.6 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 25.255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.9 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.1 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.355 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.9 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.169 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.23 µg/L | 35/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 8.201 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 28/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00060 mg/L 4% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2026 |
| Lead | 122.36 µg/L 816% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 152 µg/L | 9/121 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.264 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.27 µg/L | 2/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.09 µg/L | 2/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Sapulpa Rural Water Company
Is Sapulpa Rural Water Company tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Sapulpa Rural Water Company's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Sapulpa Rural Water Company's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Sapulpa Rural Water Company serve?
Sapulpa Rural Water Company reports serving 5,810 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Sapulpa Rural Water Company had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 48 violations on file for Sapulpa Rural Water Company, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.