Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 464.85 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1260 µg/L | 264/300 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 73.86 µg/L 123% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 106 µg/L | 133/133 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 129.35 µg/L 162% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 32.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.7 µg/L | 104/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 46.575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.5 µg/L | 104/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.77 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.9 µg/L | 104/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.165 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L | 104/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.885 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L | 104/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.414 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.79 µg/L | 73/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 9.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 51/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.9475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 16/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.65 µg/L | 16/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 60.86 µg/L 406% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.5 µg/L | 9/300 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Creek Co Rwd # 2
Is Creek Co Rwd # 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Creek Co Rwd # 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Creek Co Rwd # 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Creek Co Rwd # 2 serve?
Creek Co Rwd # 2 reports serving 12,788 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Creek Co Rwd # 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 107 violations on file for Creek Co Rwd # 2, of which 76 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.