Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 610.1 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 908 µg/L | 83/101 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.194 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.83 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 59.886 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77.78 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 42.988 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.76 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 80.26 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 97 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 84.05 µg/L 140% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 105.98 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 37.88 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46.78 µg/L | 49/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.114 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.94 µg/L | 45/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.872 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.79 µg/L | 27/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 32.675 µg/L 218% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36.5 µg/L | 4/101 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.2195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.22 µg/L | 2/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.218 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.22 µg/L | 2/49 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Craig Co Rwd #2
Is Craig Co Rwd #2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Craig Co Rwd #2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Craig Co Rwd #2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Craig Co Rwd #2 serve?
Craig Co Rwd #2 reports serving 4,250 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Craig Co Rwd #2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 63 violations on file for Craig Co Rwd #2, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.