Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-01-01 → 2004-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 393.65 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 549 µg/L | 14/55 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.8465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.04 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 64.231 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77.74 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.9255 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 18.233 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.14 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 89.7505 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100.33 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 73.8535 µg/L 123% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 85.54 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 25.0715 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.18 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 37.828 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41.68 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 30 µg/L 200% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L | 6/56 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.61 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Corral Kreek Subdiv
Is Corral Kreek Subdiv tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Corral Kreek Subdiv's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Corral Kreek Subdiv's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Corral Kreek Subdiv serve?
Corral Kreek Subdiv reports serving 273 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Corral Kreek Subdiv had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 24 violations on file for Corral Kreek Subdiv, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.