Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 245 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 354 µg/L | 25/25 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| TTHM | 135.845 µg/L 170% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 165.9 µg/L | 24/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 31.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50 µg/L | 23/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.4 µg/L | 23/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 87.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 99.7 µg/L | 23/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 23.085 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.3 µg/L | 22/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0331 mg/L 221% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 36.54 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.9 µg/L | 17/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.14 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.7 µg/L | 15/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 5.801 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.78 µg/L | 12/25 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.5 µg/L | 9/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.609 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.17 µg/L | 7/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.856 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.96 µg/L | 5/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1935 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ratliff City
Is Ratliff City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Ratliff City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ratliff City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ratliff City serve?
Ratliff City reports serving 131 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Ratliff City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 55 violations on file for Ratliff City, of which 45 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.