Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 107.35 µg/L 134% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 162 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 49.26 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.9 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 29.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34.1 µg/L | 106/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 55.75 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 76.9 µg/L | 106/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 21.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L | 106/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 104/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.9575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.13 µg/L | 102/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 27.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.9 µg/L | 100/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 1112.5 µg/L 86% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2020 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 6.721 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.41 µg/L | 79/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.0645 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.15 µg/L | 20/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 15.36 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.2 µg/L | 17/90 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 760 µg/L 7.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 14/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.724 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.55 µg/L | 13/104 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 48.1 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
| Fluoride | 250 µg/L 6.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2013 |
64 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wagoner Co. Rwd #4
Is Wagoner Co. Rwd #4 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Wagoner Co. Rwd #4's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wagoner Co. Rwd #4's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wagoner Co. Rwd #4 serve?
Wagoner Co. Rwd #4 reports serving 25,792 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Wagoner Co. Rwd #4 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 428 violations on file for Wagoner Co. Rwd #4, of which 381 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.