← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Wagoner Co. Rwd #5

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 103 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

103
contaminants tested
24
detected
4,251
people served
164
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wagoner

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

164
health-based violations
199
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-05-01 → 2015-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30
MRDL Health-based Resolved 2008-12-01 → 2008-12-31
MRDL Health-based Resolved 2008-12-01 → 2008-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0083 µg/L 3/4 2024
PFHXS 0.0150 µg/L 3/4 2024
PFOS 0.0340 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0057 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfba 0.0079 µg/L 1/4 2024
PFBS 0.0032 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
643.25 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 756 µg/L
96/96 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
69.315 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.6 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.42 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.3 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.6 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
40.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 44.9 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.175 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.735 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.3 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L
54/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.64 µg/L
49/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
342.2 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 357 µg/L
39/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
1.9385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.65 µg/L
24/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.919 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.14 µg/L
18/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.07 µg/L
11/54 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.3240 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2018–2019
Barium
45.7 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
79 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WAGONER CO. RWD #5
Phone
918-486-5458
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Wagoner Co. Rwd #5

Is Wagoner Co. Rwd #5 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Wagoner Co. Rwd #5's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wagoner Co. Rwd #5's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wagoner Co. Rwd #5 serve?

Wagoner Co. Rwd #5 reports serving 4,251 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Wagoner Co. Rwd #5 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 199 violations on file for Wagoner Co. Rwd #5, of which 164 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.