Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 100 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

100
contaminants tested
17
detected
10,470
people served
100
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Rogers

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

100
health-based violations
166
violations on file
10
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
TT Health-based Addressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Addressed 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-04-01 → 2023-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
23.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30 µg/L
89/89 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
78.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86.7 µg/L
89/89 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.876 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L
89/89 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
32.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.3 µg/L
87/87 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
108 µg/L 135%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L
87/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
65.26 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 81.7 µg/L
87/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.4 µg/L
87/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
191.1 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
70/72 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.094 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.57 µg/L
45/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.6515 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.91 µg/L
12/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
400 µg/L 4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 10/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.4375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.49 µg/L
6/87 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.738 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.74 µg/L
5/89 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.75 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
3/72 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
48.5 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.0100 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2019
83 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ROGERS CO RWD # 3 LAKE PLANT
Phone
918-341-6779
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant

Is Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant serve?

Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant reports serving 10,470 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 166 violations on file for Rogers Co Rwd # 3 Lake Plant, of which 100 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.