Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Rogers Co Rwd # 5

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 86 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

86
contaminants tested
18
detected
11,782
people served
27
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Rogers

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

27
health-based violations
59
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1348.4 µg/L 104%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2700 µg/L
192/301 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
86.84 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 149 µg/L
133/133 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
46.82 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 51.9 µg/L
133/133 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
24.285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 41 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52.865 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 84.3 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
14.795 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.9 µg/L
122/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.3 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
121/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.168 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.44 µg/L
105/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Chlorite
696.4 µg/L 70%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 815 µg/L
80/93 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.354 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.07 µg/L
67/122 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
51.75 µg/L 345%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 74 µg/L
36/301 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.607 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.01 µg/L
35/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
7.298 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.61 µg/L
35/121 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 22/22 LCR 2025
Nitrate-Nitrite
680 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
76.7 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Lithium
10.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/4 UCMR-5 2025
68 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDiquatEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ROGERS CO RWD # 5
Phone
918-266-4634
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rogers Co Rwd # 5

Is Rogers Co Rwd # 5 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Rogers Co Rwd # 5's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rogers Co Rwd # 5's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rogers Co Rwd # 5 serve?

Rogers Co Rwd # 5 reports serving 11,782 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Rogers Co Rwd # 5 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 59 violations on file for Rogers Co Rwd # 5, of which 27 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.