Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2025-01-01 → 2025-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 211.45 µg/L 264% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 279 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 43.615 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.9 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chlorite | 996.75 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1180 µg/L | 130/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 46.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60.5 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 90.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 125 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 82.66 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 108 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 26.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33.1 µg/L | 119/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L | 113/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 36.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 55.3 µg/L | 111/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 630.6 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1340 µg/L | 90/91 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 685 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 850 µg/L | 86/86 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.7825 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.4 µg/L | 76/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.264 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.6 µg/L | 42/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 97.6 µg/L 651% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 113 µg/L | 12/91 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2959 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3310 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 210 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.749 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.78 µg/L | 2/121 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 11.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
77 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Altus
Is Altus tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Altus's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Altus's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chlorite, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Altus serve?
Altus reports serving 18,717 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.
Has Altus had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 559 violations on file for Altus, of which 487 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.