← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Sardis Lake Water Authority

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
14
detected
307
people served
1,089
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Pushmataha

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1,089
health-based violations
1,226
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
2127.35 µg/L 164%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3159.71 µg/L
98/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
34.865 µg/L 232%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 181 µg/L
86/98 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.4 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
156.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 235 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
166.628 µg/L 208%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 249.9 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
92.27 µg/L 154%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 107.3 µg/L
44/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
44.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.4 µg/L
43/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
44.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.4 µg/L
42/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.41 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.82 µg/L
41/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00063 mg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.6345 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.41 µg/L
12/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
300 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
23.1 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Bromoform
0.9500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/57 SYR4 2012–2019
36 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDibromoacetic AcidEthylbenzeneFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SARDIS LAKE WATER AUTHORITY
Phone
918-569-4685
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Sardis Lake Water Authority

Is Sardis Lake Water Authority tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Sardis Lake Water Authority's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sardis Lake Water Authority's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sardis Lake Water Authority serve?

Sardis Lake Water Authority reports serving 307 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Sardis Lake Water Authority had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 1226 violations on file for Sardis Lake Water Authority, of which 1089 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.