Is North Baltimore Village Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Surface water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Wood

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-01-01 → 2005-03-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1999-06-01 → 1999-06-30
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1999-06-01 → 1999-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).

Contaminant	Max	Detection rate	Period
Pfba	0.0054 µg/L	1/3	2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Nitrate	1376.5 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 1640 µg/L	118/192	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	63.65 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 98.2 µg/L	71/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	4.475 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L	71/71	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	78.45 µg/L 98% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 118 µg/L	71/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	33.8 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 37.4 µg/L	71/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane	13.76 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15.3 µg/L	70/70	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	25.865 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 27.2 µg/L	70/70	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	6.88 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L	69/69	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	2.32 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L	59/68	SYR4	2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite	1371 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L worst single sample: 1640 µg/L	59/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.15 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L	26/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	17/17	LCR	2025
Fluoride	983 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L worst single sample: 990 µg/L	8/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	0.7875 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L	6/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	1 µg/L No EPA limit set	2/71	SYR4	2012–2019
Barium	27.8 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	1/8	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	70 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L	1/60	SYR4	2013–2019

65 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoLeadMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: BENDER, JOSH
Phone: 419-257-2394
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about North Baltimore Village

Is North Baltimore Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in North Baltimore Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in North Baltimore Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does North Baltimore Village serve?

North Baltimore Village reports serving 3,432 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has North Baltimore Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 76 violations on file for North Baltimore Village, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.