← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Tri-County Rural W and S District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 66 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

66
contaminants tested
15
detected
3,000
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
73
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-09-01 → 1995-09-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-12-04
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-12-04
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-07-01 → 2001-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-07-01 → 2001-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-07-01 → 2001-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2000-07-01 → 2001-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
9543 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11700 µg/L
232/236 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
893.405 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
40/40 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0032 mg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2025
Dibromochloromethane
4.421 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.47 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
5.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/15 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
16.65 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
13/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
9988 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10000 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2018–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.157 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.96 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
11/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.88 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
9/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
4/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
83.24 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
5.968 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.22 µg/L
3/40 SYR4 2014–2019
51 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDiquatEndothallEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)TrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ARMSTRONG, CANDICE A
Phone
740-984-2348
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Tri-County Rural W and S District

Is Tri-County Rural W and S District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Tri-County Rural W and S District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Tri-County Rural W and S District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Tri-County Rural W and S District serve?

Tri-County Rural W and S District reports serving 3,000 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Tri-County Rural W and S District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 73 violations on file for Tri-County Rural W and S District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.