Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-12-23 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2023-11-22 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2022-11-23 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2022-10-24 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.00030 mg/L 2% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Bromoform | 10.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.2 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Chloroform | 22.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.5 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 21.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.3 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| TTHM | 64 µg/L 80% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65.8 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 12.975 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2018 |
4 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex
Is Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex serve?
Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex reports serving 446 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 35 violations on file for Reno Water and Sewer - Kardex, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.