Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-04-01 → 2017-06-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1658 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2200 µg/L | 182/192 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1640 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2200 µg/L | 91/96 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 20.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.9 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 67.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78.4 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 31.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.1 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 67.275 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 32.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L | 65/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 98.91 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 101.1 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 45/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.085 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L | 44/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 145.65 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 152 µg/L | 22/41 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 2.315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 20/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 27.6 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1186 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.59 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 2/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1364 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1400 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.6 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/41 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
57 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Newton Falls City
Is Newton Falls City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Newton Falls City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Newton Falls City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Newton Falls City serve?
Newton Falls City reports serving 6,109 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Newton Falls City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 128 violations on file for Newton Falls City, of which 28 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.