Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 652.5 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0160 mg/L 107% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 30.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.1 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 32.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 56.6 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 39.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 46 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 15.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 27.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.4 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 111.9 µg/L 140% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 123.3 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 86.18 µg/L 144% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 15/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 47.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 72.7 µg/L | 13/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L | 10/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 21.225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.6 µg/L | 6/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 15900 µg/L 159% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L | 4/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 208.3 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 212 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 15314.5 µg/L 153% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 15900 µg/L | 2/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 26 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
50 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La
Is St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La serve?
St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La reports serving 143 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 181 violations on file for St. Luke Lutheran Community - Portage La, of which 38 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.