← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Attica Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 54 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

54
contaminants tested
19
detected
1,148
people served
175
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Seneca

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

175
health-based violations
410
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2010 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2430 µg/L
174/214 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1947 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2430 µg/L
87/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.4 µg/L
71/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
70.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85.9 µg/L
71/71 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
101.5 µg/L 127%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 117 µg/L
71/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
48.9 µg/L 82%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.6 µg/L
71/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L
71/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.5055 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L
70/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.5 µg/L
69/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
222.5 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 347 µg/L
39/89 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.83 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.4 µg/L
35/70 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0056 mg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2025
Lead
27.3 µg/L 182%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.7 µg/L
15/89 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
11/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1105.5 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1130 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.86 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
5/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.4080 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4200 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.6385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6400 µg/L
4/71 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
10 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/88 SYR4 2012–2019
35 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBariumBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylbenzeneLassoMercurySeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SANDERS, LOUIS
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Attica Village

Is Attica Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Attica Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Attica Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Attica Village serve?

Attica Village reports serving 1,148 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Attica Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 410 violations on file for Attica Village, of which 175 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.