Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Archived | 2025-07-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 2010 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2430 µg/L | 174/214 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1947 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2430 µg/L | 87/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.4 µg/L | 71/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 70.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85.9 µg/L | 71/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 101.5 µg/L 127% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 117 µg/L | 71/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 48.9 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.6 µg/L | 71/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L | 71/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.5055 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 70/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.5 µg/L | 69/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 222.5 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 347 µg/L | 39/89 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.83 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.4 µg/L | 35/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0056 mg/L 37% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 25/25 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 27.3 µg/L 182% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.7 µg/L | 15/89 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 11/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1105.5 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1130 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 5/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.4080 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4200 µg/L | 4/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6385 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6400 µg/L | 4/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrite | 10 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/88 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
35 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Attica Village
Is Attica Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Attica Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Attica Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Attica Village serve?
Attica Village reports serving 1,148 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Attica Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 410 violations on file for Attica Village, of which 175 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.