Tap WaterIndex

← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 84 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

84
contaminants tested
19
detected
6,458
people served
4
health-based violations
Ohio rankingsLead in OhioPFAS in Ohio
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Scioto

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
29
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-02
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2021-11-24
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0042 µg/L 1/1 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
884 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1920 µg/L
124/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
36.19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.6 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
19.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.9 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
106.73 µg/L 133%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 125 µg/L
43/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
60.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66.4 µg/L
41/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
14.36 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L
34/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.26 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 30.9 µg/L
29/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
28/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
27/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
26/43 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0013 mg/L 8.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 25/25 LCR 2025
Nitrate
380 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 6/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
143 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 147 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
14.64 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L
5/241 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
377 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 380 µg/L
3/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1348.5 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1370 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
3 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/43 SYR4 2012–2019
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BARKHURST, JOHN
Phone
740-354-9140
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp

Is Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp serve?

Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp reports serving 6,458 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 29 violations on file for Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.