Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-02-01 → 2010-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-02-01 → 2010-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-02-01 → 2010-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-02-01 → 2010-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-02-01 → 2010-02-28 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 5890 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8310 µg/L | 256/258 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 28.47 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 130/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 64.965 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 72.1 µg/L | 130/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 16.655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.4 µg/L | 130/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 103.455 µg/L 129% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 122.2 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.685 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.2 µg/L | 124/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 25.88 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.2 µg/L | 124/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.805 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L | 120/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 120/125 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 118/127 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 58 µg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 76/134 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Atrazine | 1.195 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 30/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Simazine | 0.1200 µg/L 3% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 21/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 18/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 34.55 µg/L 230% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 11/120 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Barium | 26 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1183 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1210 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/4 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| 2,4-D | 0.1300 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
75 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Fremont City
Is Fremont City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Fremont City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Fremont City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Fremont City serve?
Fremont City reports serving 18,319 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Fremont City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 229 violations on file for Fremont City, of which 181 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.