Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0081 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1910 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2220 µg/L | 164/192 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.1675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.24 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 59.5925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73.05 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L | 66/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 83.271 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.07 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.513 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.89 µg/L | 58/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 30.659 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 36.3 µg/L | 58/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.54 µg/L | 58/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 45.46 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 120 µg/L | 48/82 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.0172 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.56 µg/L | 43/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2056 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2220 µg/L | 30/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.144 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 28/66 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 1050 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.475 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L | 8/59 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 21.19 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.477 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.56 µg/L | 2/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 5 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Shelby City
Is Shelby City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Shelby City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Shelby City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Shelby City serve?
Shelby City reports serving 9,453 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Shelby City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 186 violations on file for Shelby City, of which 99 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.