← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Pm Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 52 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

52
contaminants tested
13
detected
197
people served
14
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Portage

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

14
health-based violations
122
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
21/21 LCR 2023
Copper
88 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
13/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.6615 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L
7/10 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
33.92 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.4 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.149 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
22.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
3/10 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
50 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.005 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
210 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
39 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NASKA, VINCE
Phone
330-217-2924
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pm Estates

Is Pm Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Pm Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pm Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pm Estates serve?

Pm Estates reports serving 197 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Pm Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 122 violations on file for Pm Estates, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.