Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 32.145 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.9 µg/L | 22/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.65 µg/L | 17/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5.048 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.92 µg/L | 17/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 17.308 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.3 µg/L | 17/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 15.608 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.24 µg/L | 17/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 537 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.93775 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.617 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.3661 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.461 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 54.971 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 56.7 µg/L | 14/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.59825 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.375 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 10.08 µg/L 101% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 10.1 µg/L | 5/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 234.8 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 3.39 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.42 µg/L | 5/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Fluoride | 965 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 970 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 358.5 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 372 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.4493 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.457 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
63 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Waverly City
Is Waverly City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Waverly City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Waverly City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Waverly City serve?
Waverly City reports serving 4,433 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Waverly City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 79 violations on file for Waverly City, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.