Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-06 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-06 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-07-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 3440 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5090 µg/L | 168/194 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 75.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 84.2 µg/L | 141/141 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.9 µg/L | 140/140 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.03 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L | 139/139 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 93.02 µg/L 116% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 103 µg/L | 133/133 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 42.92 µg/L 72% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.7 µg/L | 133/133 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.3 µg/L | 132/133 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.2 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 238.3 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 925 µg/L | 90/92 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 3440.5 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5120 µg/L | 84/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L | 77/130 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.555 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 44/136 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 15/133 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 27 µg/L 1.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1098 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1110 µg/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 48.75 µg/L 325% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 6/92 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrite | 100 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L | 1/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Ottawa County Regional Water District
Is Ottawa County Regional Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Ottawa County Regional Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Ottawa County Regional Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Ottawa County Regional Water District serve?
Ottawa County Regional Water District reports serving 20,428 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Ottawa County Regional Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 10 violations on file for Ottawa County Regional Water District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.