Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-12-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-05-01 → 2020-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-05-01 → 2020-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-05-01 → 2020-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-05-01 → 2020-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-06-01 → 2018-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1900 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6450 µg/L | 186/200 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1872 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6450 µg/L | 93/100 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 732 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 69/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.9 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 59.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 67.5 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 25.135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.2 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 81.595 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90.3 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 20.615 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 48.37 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 61.3 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 35/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 33/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0109 mg/L 73% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 30/30 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 9.805 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 14/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 11/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 131 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 20 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
35 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Put-In-Bay Village
Is Put-In-Bay Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Put-In-Bay Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Put-In-Bay Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Nitrate-Nitrite, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Put-In-Bay Village serve?
Put-In-Bay Village reports serving 5,000 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Put-In-Bay Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 224 violations on file for Put-In-Bay Village, of which 126 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.