← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Union City

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
22
detected
7,000
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
35
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2020-01-21
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0200 µg/L 2/4 2025
Pfhpa 0.0034 µg/L 1/4 2025
Pfhxa 0.0063 µg/L 1/4 2025
PFOA 0.0048 µg/L 1/4 2025
Pfpea 0.0054 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
359 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 837 µg/L
81/81 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
8.83 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.8 µg/L
61/78 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1560 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
8.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
17/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.45 µg/L
17/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.43 µg/L
16/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
9.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
16/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.88425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.017 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
25.9825 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.172 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.54 µg/L
15/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.714 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.504 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
9/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
239 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1092 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1120 µg/L
5/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.793 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
517 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
APPLEGATE, JOHN P
Phone
937-836-8624
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Union City

Is Union City tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Union City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Union City's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Union City serve?

Union City reports serving 7,000 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Union City had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Union City, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.