← Ohio

Tap water quality report

New Lebanon Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 84 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

84
contaminants tested
18
detected
3,770
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
40
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-11-24

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
365.05 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1440 µg/L
104/104 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
16.1 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 32.1 µg/L
41/103 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0015 mg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
26/26 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
5.116 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.54 µg/L
17/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11.3125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.64 µg/L
16/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
15.055 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.68 µg/L
15/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
2.007 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.28 µg/L
15/18 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
33.459 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.75 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
10.452 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.88 µg/L
14/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.8898 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.641 µg/L
13/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
554 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
8/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.419 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.429 µg/L
6/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
98.17 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 98.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1264 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1270 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1.2855 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.32 µg/L
2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.2156 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.217 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
519 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2016
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.029 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/15 SYR4 2012–2019
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
EASOM II, DENNIS
Phone
937-813-0720
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about New Lebanon Village

Is New Lebanon Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in New Lebanon Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Lebanon Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Lebanon Village serve?

New Lebanon Village reports serving 3,770 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has New Lebanon Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 40 violations on file for New Lebanon Village, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.