Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-12-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2018-12-02 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-09-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-06-01 → 2012-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 528.95 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 723 µg/L | 90/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.218 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.35 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 28.812 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39.52 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.856 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.07 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 39.474 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 53.45 µg/L | 37/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.01275 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.35 µg/L | 36/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.433 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.226 µg/L | 31/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.1752 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.581 µg/L | 28/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 12.198 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 34.5 µg/L | 19/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0032 mg/L 21% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 702 µg/L 7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 86.4 µg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 1093 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 0.5100 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.568 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/37 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
68 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Nawa
Is Nawa tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Nawa's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Nawa's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Nawa serve?
Nawa reports serving 29,974 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Nawa had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 11 violations on file for Nawa, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.