← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Leading Creek Conservancy District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 83 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

83
contaminants tested
17
detected
6,663
people served
45
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Meigs

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

45
health-based violations
61
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0076 µg/L 2/2 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1554.75 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3161 µg/L
198/202 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2025
Nitrate
2460 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
32.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.4 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.522 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.44 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.015 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.05 µg/L
15/17 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
40.89 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.8 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.59 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
14.15 µg/L 94%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.8 µg/L
11/202 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.208 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.34 µg/L
7/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
49.22 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.7 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
1041.4 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1050 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
2451.5 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2460 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
3.53 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/15 SYR4 2012–2019
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitritePfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JOHNSON, ROCKY
Phone
740-742-2411
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Leading Creek Conservancy District

Is Leading Creek Conservancy District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Leading Creek Conservancy District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Leading Creek Conservancy District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromoform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Leading Creek Conservancy District serve?

Leading Creek Conservancy District reports serving 6,663 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Leading Creek Conservancy District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 61 violations on file for Leading Creek Conservancy District, of which 45 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.