Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1997-02-01 → 1997-02-28 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0.0076 µg/L | 2/2 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1554.75 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 3161 µg/L | 198/202 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 2460 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 32.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.4 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.522 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.44 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.015 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.05 µg/L | 15/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 40.89 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.8 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.59 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 14.15 µg/L 94% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.8 µg/L | 11/202 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.208 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.34 µg/L | 7/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 49.22 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49.7 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 1041.4 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1050 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2451.5 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2460 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.57 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 3.53 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.97 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
66 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Leading Creek Conservancy District
Is Leading Creek Conservancy District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Leading Creek Conservancy District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Leading Creek Conservancy District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromoform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Leading Creek Conservancy District serve?
Leading Creek Conservancy District reports serving 6,663 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Leading Creek Conservancy District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 61 violations on file for Leading Creek Conservancy District, of which 45 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.