Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-01-01 → 2018-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0110 µg/L | 6/8 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 17.72 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.5 µg/L | 77/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 79.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 103 µg/L | 77/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L | 77/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 99.36 µg/L 124% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 125 µg/L | 77/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20.835 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.4 µg/L | 74/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 26.31 µg/L 44% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L | 74/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.6 µg/L | 68/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L | 65/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.7 µg/L | 51/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.665 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 8/74 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 64.35 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L | 4/45 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 12.3 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/49 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Whitehouse Village
Is Whitehouse Village tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Whitehouse Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Whitehouse Village's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Whitehouse Village serve?
Whitehouse Village reports serving 5,200 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Whitehouse Village had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 52 violations on file for Whitehouse Village, of which 29 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.