← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Maumee City

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
13
detected
14,286
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lucas

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
7
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-03
Other Monitoring Resolved 2019-01-03
Other Monitoring Resolved 2002-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2002-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1992-07-01 → 1992-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1992-07-01 → 1992-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1992-07-01 → 1992-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
14.195 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
50.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 76.5 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
67.555 µg/L 84%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 93.8 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
20.855 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.1 µg/L
128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
14.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21.7 µg/L
125/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
119/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
113/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
71/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
22 µg/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 58 µg/L
67/90 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
22/22 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
16/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
17.4 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
9/90 SYR4 2014–2018
31 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
BURTCH, PATRICK
Phone
419-897-7115
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Maumee City

Is Maumee City tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Maumee City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Maumee City's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Maumee City serve?

Maumee City reports serving 14,286 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Maumee City had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 7 violations on file for Maumee City, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.