Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-07-01 → 2010-07-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-12-15 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-11-05 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-02-05 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2018-12-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 139 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2300 µg/L | 162/210 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 15.495 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.8 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 43.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.1 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.2 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.8 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 64.82 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.4 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31.965 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.3 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15.025 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19.5 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.99 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 63/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.8000 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L | 52/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 29/29 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3.105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L | 20/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 10.54 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 13/209 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about North Ridgeville City
Is North Ridgeville City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in North Ridgeville City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in North Ridgeville City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does North Ridgeville City serve?
North Ridgeville City reports serving 29,465 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has North Ridgeville City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for North Ridgeville City, of which 3 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.