Tap WaterIndex

← Ohio

Tap water quality report

Hcwsd - East Cadiz

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
191
people served
0
health-based violations
Ohio rankingsLead in OhioPFAS in Ohio
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Harrison

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-01-07
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2020-02-06

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
69.155 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 127 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2018–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.1 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Chloroform
88.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.114 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.69 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.1 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 9/9 LCR 2026
TTHM
100 µg/L 125%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 101 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
56.76 µg/L 95%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59.6 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
30.28 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32.1 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Bromoform
0.9540 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9600 µg/L
4/9 SYR4 2018–2019
Lead
2.617 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.69 µg/L
2/30 SYR4 2018–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/9 SYR4 2018–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
NORRIS, AMY
Phone
740-942-0411
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Hcwsd - East Cadiz

Is Hcwsd - East Cadiz tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Hcwsd - East Cadiz's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hcwsd - East Cadiz's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hcwsd - East Cadiz serve?

Hcwsd - East Cadiz reports serving 191 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.

Has Hcwsd - East Cadiz had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Hcwsd - East Cadiz, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.