Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-10-18 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2018-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2001-10-01 → 2001-10-31 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOA | 0.0074 µg/L | 1/4 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 350 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 620 µg/L | 89/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 14.385 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 41/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 13.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.3 µg/L | 38/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 43.53 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 60.4 µg/L | 38/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 34/42 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 878 µg/L 8.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1010 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 21/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.115 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L | 20/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 11.84 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L | 20/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 19/19 | LCR | 2023 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 830 µg/L 8.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1010 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 27.35 µg/L 182% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 12/90 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.61 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 7/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 37.2 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 1045.5 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1050 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.1 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
64 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Tate-Monroe Water Association
Is Tate-Monroe Water Association tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Tate-Monroe Water Association's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Tate-Monroe Water Association's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Tate-Monroe Water Association serve?
Tate-Monroe Water Association reports serving 24,092 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Tate-Monroe Water Association had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 69 violations on file for Tate-Monroe Water Association, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.