Compliance record
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFBS | 0.0031 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1303 µg/L 100% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1680 µg/L | 128/129 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.675 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.2235 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 8.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 27.435 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.4 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.705 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 34/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2835 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3000 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L | 30/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 25/25 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 9.6515 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 18.5 µg/L | 18/129 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2775 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.025 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 6/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 998.5 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 39.43 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
92 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Southwest Regional Water District
Is Southwest Regional Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Southwest Regional Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Southwest Regional Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Southwest Regional Water District serve?
Southwest Regional Water District reports serving 42,856 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Southwest Regional Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Southwest Regional Water District.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.